« Relief! | Main | This is Your Brain After a Stroke »

June 12, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551cf0982883300e5533c53d08834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Birth Story #345: A Beautiful Second Birth:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

This is why I think FPs have a different perspective on childbirth practices: they take care of babies as well as mothers. I took care of one newborn with a fetal-scalp electrode abscess once, and that changed my attitude towards unthinking use of internal monitors forever. If I have a good reason to use them, I do. If I don't--I remember that abscess and refrain.

Whoops! Residence = residents. Sorry for the typo!

Being a frequent reader of AHRQ, I was well aware that continuous fetal monitoring is not linked to improved maternal or fetal outcomes, just to increased cesarean rates. I am in an area (South Florida) in which hospitals tend towards increased medicalization regardless of the evidence behind the practice. In fact, a new attending at the only ob/gyn residency in the area told me she was shocked to find that the residence were trained to use INTERNAL fetal monitoring on all laboring mothers.

It is refreshing to know that in other areas that intermittent monitoring is considered acceptable protocol in a hospital setting.

There is not evidence that continuous fetal monitoring improves outcomes, but I associate its almost universal use with limits of staffing. At a busy hospital, a nurse may not have time to apply and remove monitors every 15 minutes during the second stage, or whatever local guidelines demand.

In Rural, most of the nurses are supportive of a low-intervention birth, and the pre-printed order sheet allows me to check off "intermittent" or "continuous" for fetal monitoring. So many of our nurses are willing to hold a monitor on for a few minutes then remove it so it doesn't bother a laboring woman. So it really, really depends on the philosophy at the hospital.

What a beautiful birth story! I trained as a midwife in a freestanding birth center before attending medical school. I have been a doula at several hospital births in the area. I love your birth stories.

I have only seen intermittent monitoring at out of hospital births. How many hospitals would allow or encourage intermittent monitoring instead of continuous monitoring? I was surprised but happy to see you mention it in your birth story. I mentioned the difference today when giving a tour of the birth center to fellow medical students in our Ob/Gyn interest club.

The comments to this entry are closed.